Find an Asbestos Litigation Firm That Specializes in Mesothelioma

For any legal issue, it's best to work with a law firm that has expertise in the field you require assistance with. A lawyer who focuses on car accidents would not be able handle a lawsuit that involves mesothelioma.

Asbestos lawyers who specialize in mesothelioma litigation have the experience and knowledge required to secure compensation for the victims. They are also well-versed in the latest asbestos laws and rulings that pertain to asbestos litigation.

Levy Konigsberg, LLC

Levy Konigsberg LLP (LK) is a major asbestos litigation firm that has offices in New York and New Jersey. Its lawyers have won multimillion-dollar settlements and verdicts for victims of mesothelioma or asbestos cancer, as well as lead poisoning in New York, California, Georgia and across the country. Its lawyers have also experience handling cases involving medical negligence as well as product liability and consumer fraud.

In the last three decades, LK represented victims of asbestos-related diseases and mesothelioma. Their lawyers have won many of the highest jury awards for victims, with some of the largest damage amounts in history. The firm's attorneys have also successfully defended high-profile litigation that involved toxic exposure and corporate wrongdoing.

The firm's lawyers have expertise in pursuing litigation in different cases against companies involved in the production and distribution of asbestos. These include a number of large corporations as well as major construction companies as well as property owners. LK has also successfully sued asbestos producers in cases involving toxic contamination of industrial facilities and military sites.

In addition to representing asbestos victims The firm also represents clients with other types of personal injury claims. Among these are those who were injured in accidents, car crashes, and by medical negligence. In some cases, the firm represents families that have lost loved loved ones due to medical malpractice.

Lawyers at Levy Konigsberg LLP have won numerous awards, including the title of Best Lawyer in America for Personal Injury Lawyers and Super Lawyers in Plaintiff Personal Injury. U.S. News & World Report has also ranked them as one of America's most reputable mesothelioma law firms.

Over the past 30 years, LK has pursued justice for thousands of people and women who have been diagnosed with asbestos-related ailments. Their clients are mostly residents of Maryland and other states across the country. The patients were exposed to harmful substances and developed serious health issues, such as mesothelioma and lung cancer.

Attorneys at LK have licenses to practice law in New York, New Jersey and federal district courts throughout the 50 states. Individual attorneys are also licensed to practice in other states according to their education and their particular expertise in asbestos lawsuit litigation.

Waters Kraus & Paul

If you or someone you know has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it is important that you find an attorney who can help you get the justice you are due. The mesothelioma attorneys at Waters Kraus & Paul have years of experience in this challenging field of law and are dedicated to helping their clients get the most effective results they can. They do not settle cases quickly and are dedicated to obtaining the highest amount of damages that they can for their clients.

The firm is a top national law firm, with offices in Dallas (Texas), Los Angeles (California) and Moline (Illinois). The firm's attorneys represent clients from all 50 states, as well as numerous other nations. They have won hundreds of millions in settlements and verdicts for their clients. They also are determined to fight for the rights of victims in asbestos litigation. They have served on many advisory committees representing asbestos bankruptcy trustees and creditors.

Peter Kraus, a founding member of Waters Kraus & Paul, is an expert in toxic torts as well as pharmaceutical injury and False Claims Act cases. He has tried and ruled in numerous asbestos, benzene, and pharmaceutical cases in federal and state courts across the nation. This includes the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. He has also testified before the Texas Legislature and Congress on behalf of asbestos victims.

In the past asbestos plaintiffs' companies hired people suffering from asbestos-related illnesses and put them in a group to file lawsuits in bulk. These tactics were designed to overwhelm the courts and defraud defendants. After the adoption of Senate Bill 15 this practice has been stopped in large part across the nation and in Texas.

Peter Kraus believes that Garlock Sealing Technologies' claim is absurd. Peter Kraus claims that Garlock's allegations are not true and that none of his clients have been lying to Garlock. Waters Kraus & Paul lawyers believe that honesty is the best defense for their clients and their families.

Weitz & Luxenberg

Mesothelioma patients need a firm with the resources, tenacity and experience to secure fair compensation. The national law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg has helped asbestos victims collect billions in verdicts and settlements since its founding on the year 1986. The firm's 90 lawyers form teams of litigators known for their smart negotiation techniques and swift tactics at the bargaining table. They will do whatever they can to bring your case to a speedy and a satisfactory conclusion.

Mesothelioma is a devastating disease that can cause physical, emotional, and financial hardship for victims and their families. Exposure to asbestos lawsuit is linked to the growth of this cancer which can take decades to develop and eventually kill. Many companies knowingly put profits over safety of workers and do not disclose the dangers of their products.

People who worked with or around asbestos have a higher chance of developing asbestos-related diseases, including mesothelioma and lung cancer. Workers often brought asbestos fibers home in their clothes or on their skin where they were then transferred to family members. Asbestos-related victims are able to seek compensation for their diseases from the companies that were responsible for their exposure.

Weitz & Luxenberg has offices in New York and throughout the United States. The firm's attorneys have assisted asbestos victims recover over $17 billion in settlements and verdicts for their clients. The firm's lawyers are committed to making the process for mesothelioma sufferers as simple and as stress-free as is possible.

Asbestos litigation has gained traction in recent years and the firm is regarded as a leading expert in this area of the law. Founders Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg have years of experience in handling asbestos lawsuits, and the firm has secured some of the largest settlements in mesothelioma history.

The firm has a strong New York presence, and one of its first wins was a verdict of $75 million for 36 workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In the case the jury awarded a brake technician one of the largest verdicts for any single plaintiff.

The legal team of Weitz & Luxenberg includes attorneys Venus Burns, Leonard Sandoval and Josiah Parker. They recently secured a $23 million trial verdict for James McWilliams. He is an 81-year old steamfitter who contracted mesothelioma. The verdict gave him $10 million for future medical expenses, and $13 million in compensation for his pain in the past. The team also secured another $23 million through a consolidated trial for five former Jenkins Bros. ship fitters. Judge Joan Madden combined the cases to make it more difficult for defendants to settle.

Chris Panatier

Chris Panatier is an experienced trial lawyer who represents victims exposed to toxic substances. His skills are evident both in the more than $150 million verdicts that he has obtained for his clients and in the recognition he has received from his professional colleagues. His practice is dedicated to toxic torts. He has vast experience in asbestos litigation as well as mesothelioma. He also has experience in product liability, pharmaceuticals, commercial disputes, and catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death.

Asbestos, a poisonous mineral can cause fatal illnesses like mesothelioma. It is difficult to determine the condition, which usually occurs years after exposure. Asbestos can be exposed different ways, like manufacturing, mining, and home construction. Most asbestos exposure cases occur in the workplace.

The state of California has numerous sites where asbestos was used in the past, such as shipyards and factories. These locations are often contaminated with asbestos due to its fire resistance and insulation properties. Contaminated sites can also become breeding areas for harmful bacteria and viruses. Asbestos can also be found in soil and in water.

Although the majority of asbestos was removed from the atmosphere in the mid-1980s, asbestos lawsuit-contaminated sites continue to pose a health threat to the public. The state currently has strict environmental laws to safeguard residents and workers. Asbestos lawsuits can be complicated and it is essential to consult a mesothelioma lawyer who is experienced.

During closing arguments, Chris Panatier used an analogy of an ice cream shop to convey his case to jurors in the Johnson & Johnson talc case. The innovative approach helped him deliver a blockbuster verdict. He represented four plaintiffs who claimed J&J talc was the reason of their mesothelioma.

The jury gave $21.7 Million to Joanne Anderson, her husband and their children who were exposed asbestos through the baby powder produced by the company. The award included the sum of $4 million in punitive damages. The family also filed a lawsuit against J&J's suppliers, including Imerys SA and Honeywell International.

The verdict was handed down just blocks away from J&J's headquarters. The jury determined that J&J was aware of asbestos's dangers in the talc they produced but did not warn its customers. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Moshe Maimon of Levy Konigsberg in New York, and associate Christopher Panatier of Simon Greenstone Panatier in Dallas, argued that the company engaged in "maliciously or reckless disregard" for the plaintiffs' safety.